From 5f5b1a865958c00ad4cd40b5bf10bdfafd39fe54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vidar Holen <vidar@vidarholen.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 11:39:53 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Updated SC2012 (markdown)

---
 SC2012.md | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/SC2012.md b/SC2012.md
index 6f2c7e3..e9e1d9c 100644
--- a/SC2012.md
+++ b/SC2012.md
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ NUMGZ="$(ls -l *.gz | wc -l)"
 ### Correct code:
 
 ```sh
-find . -maxdepth 1 -name '*.txt' -user "$USER"  # Using the names of the files
+find ./*.txt -user "$USER"  # Using the names of the files
 ```
 ```sh
 gz_files=(*.gz)
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ It shows three seemingly identical filenames, and did you spot the time format c
 
 #### Just the filenames, ma'am
 
+(Note that `-maxdepth` is not POSIX, but can be simulated by having the expression call `-prune` on all directories it finds, e.g. `find ./* -prune -print`)
+
 `ls` can usually be replaced by `find` if it's just the filenames, or a count of them, that you're after. Note that if you are using `ls` to get at the contents of a directory, a straight substitution of `find` may not yield the same results as `ls`. Here is an example:
 
 ```