Updated SC2251 (markdown)

SC2251.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ set -e
 
 ```sh
 set -e
-{ ! false; }
+false && exit 1
 ```
 
 ### Rationale:
@@ -20,19 +20,20 @@ ShellCheck has found a command inverted with `!` that may have no effect. In par
 
 The most common reason for this is thinking that it'll trigger `set -e` aka `errexit` if a command succeeds, as in the example. This is not the case: `!` will inhibit errexit both on success and failure of the inverted command.
 
-Wrapping such an inverted command in a brace group will trigger `errexit` as expected, since the brace group will act as a standalone command with the same exit code.
+Using `&& exit ` will instead exit when failure when the command succeeds.
 
 ### Exceptions:
 
 ShellCheck will not detect cases where `$?` is implicitly or explicitly used to check the value afterwards:
 
 ```
+set -e;
 check_success() { [ $? -eq 0 ] || exit 1; }
 ! false; check_success
 ! true; check_success
 ```
 
-In this case, you can [[ignore]] the warning, or optionally wrap them in `{ ! false; }`.
+In this case, you can [[ignore]] the warning.
 
 ### Related resources: